In previous articles we have discussed a certain
(involuntary or deliberate) tendency to refer to certain
realities by their antonym. If gathered to discuss the issue
of health, we will invariably speak of illnesses; if it’s
work we are discussing, the issue addressed will be
unemployment; and when education is the main point on the
agenda, speakers will most certainly focus on illiteracy. So
continuing with this trend, today, on World Food Day, we
paradoxically find ourselves discussing hunger.
Hunger continues its steady growth
unperturbed as humanity shamefully looks on. On October 16,
2007 we denounced that the number of hungry people in the
world had reached the staggering figure of 852 million
people. Now, only two years later, the U.N. Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) announces that the
ranks of the world’s hungry has climbed past one billion -
1.02 billion, to be exact. That’s one in every six people in
the world. So as we celebrate FAO’s 64th
birthday and commemorate (?) World Food Day, hunger - far
from decreasing - continues to increase at an alarming rate.
The situation is so critical - every six
seconds somewhere in the world a child dies of malnutrition
- that those who contribute to perpetuate it can no longer
deny it. “The present situation of world food insecurity
cannot leave us indifferent,” FAO Director-General
Jacques Diouf. “We have the economic and technical means
to make hunger disappear, what is missing is a stronger
political will to eradicate hunger forever,” he said. But
naturally, Mr. Diouf couldn’t help but add: “World
leaders have reacted forcefully to the financial and
economic crisis and succeeded in mobilizing billions of
dollars in a short time period. The same strong action is
needed now to combat hunger and poverty.”
So, which one is it Mr. Diouf? You
can’t contradict yourself so shamelessly in the same report.
Is the problem political or is it economic? When I read that
your solution to the problem was to be found in greater
political commitment, I said to myself: Finally somebody is
recognizing that the root problem of hunger is political!
That would entail recognizing that it is the result of a
system designed to place everything - from seeds to basic
foodstuff - in the hand of a handful of companies. Do the
names Monsanto, Cargill, Nestlé,
Unilever, Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart or
Carrefour - just to mention a few transnational
corporations - say anything to you?
In the face of this reality, Mr. Diouf
tries to convince us that solving the hunger problem only
requires a political commitment to raise “billions of
dollars.” But the question is: will those dollars go to feed
these companies and their model of production? When they are
both responsible not only for hunger, but for so many of
today’s dire problems, including a mass rural exodus,
ecological devastation, soil contamination, water and air
pollution, the poisoning and death of so many by agrotoxic
chemicals, human epidemics caused by genetic transferring of
animal diseases (mad cow, bird flu, swine flu), and a long
etcetera? In sum, let’s not get our hopes up, the solution
to world hunger does not lie with FAO.
The solution is up to our
fellow workers
Meanwhile, millions of men and women around
the world are working in the fields, fishing in seas and
rivers, and processing and distributing food. Many of them
are working for meager wages, being persecuted or jailed for
trying to organize themselves in unions, or suffering under
harsh working conditions, falling victim of repetitive
stress injuries caused by the fast pace of work in assembly
lines; others are subjected to near slavery conditions or
poisoned with the chemicals they spray, conditions that are
not even acknowledged as occupational illnesses.
On this October 16, we extend our fraternal
greeting and call on all these workers. Because the solution
to hunger and so many other injustices in the world lies
necessarily with them and their organized struggle.
|