Sirel interviewed Henri Lindholm, General Secretary of the
Finnish Food and Beverage Union (SEL),
about their current union action.
For most people, Finland is
a geographically remote and cold
country. For Rel-UITA,
however, the relationship with SEL
is close and warm. The working class
of this country, historically at the
forefront in social and welfare
policies, is now living a conflict where
food workers must resist a
flexibilization attempt by employers of
the sector, who are using the new
legislation and the support of the
government in force.
-How did this conflict come about?
-SEL has
been in this prolonged conflict since
early 2010 when the negotiation process
began. Our Union has five national
collective bargaining agreements by
industry, all of which expired on 31
March. Since then, we have been experiencing a difficult situation with
strikes and walkouts.
In Finland,
collective agreements are signed for one
to four years. These agreements were
for a three year period and we have
submitted our proposal at the
negotiation table for a four-year
agreement, but unfortunately we did not
succeed.
-Did employers want different terms and
conditions?
-In fact, employers also wanted a
four-year agreement, but the conflict is
related to the composition of the
agreement. The
issue is regulations regarding working
time. It is not so much wages levels,
the dispute is about working time and
how much employers can demand people to
work longer days.
We have faced employers' demands for extended and flexible work
earlier, but now there is new
legislations that allow shops to open 24
hours 7 days a week for the sale of
food.
Companies want a 10 hour
flexible time scheme
with 50 hour weeks,
without extra
compensation, to be
calculated as regular
working time on an
annual basis.
|
There is a lot of pressure from the
retailers because they want food to be
delivered all day long, at night and
even on week-ends. Companies want a 10
hour flexible time scheme, with 50 hour
weeks, without extra compensation, to be
taken into consideration during the
whole year, so it would be calculated as
regular working time on an annual basis.
So far, according to our collective
agreement, working overtime has always
been voluntary, an option to be
negotiated with the individual, and this
new scheme wants it to be This new
scheme wants overtime to be compulsory. In fact they are imposing a longer working day.
-Why is this situation happening now?
-The background is related to our new
reality. In Finland we
have a center-right government, which is
a coalition between the Agrarian Party
and the Conservatives, while
Social-Democrats and the Labor Party are
in the opposition. This means that from
the government they are defending more
the employers, the big business and the
industry. This determines that in this moment we are not only negotiating
with employers, in fact the legislation
has allowed companies to demand this
flexibility.
We have also faced some new developments to which we were not used: a new union
busting where employers encouraged
people to bust our strikes, this caused
that in our first three-day period, with
limited strikes of 4,000 o 5,000.
Our second strike, once this was
overcome, was a strike of 9,000 workers
in 57 production sites throughout the
country. This caused concern in the meat
industry. It was then when the
conciliation process began, with the
State mediator, but there, in turn, he
usually takes more into account the
views of the employer than the union.
Consequently, the process has been very
slow and without sufficient results.
-How does the negotiation process go on
now?
-This coming Monday we resume the
conciliation process. The background is
that our Union Board had to reject three
proposals already, if there is a fourth
one, we hope that the mediator this time
has into account our views on working
time and that we have a more balanced
proposal and we can reach an agreement
before
25 May, date set to go on strike for the food and beverage sector,
which would be very hard for us, but SEL
has 24,000 members and all of them would
go on strike if we do not reach a
solution before.
Please let me add that we have received
solidarity messages from the
National Confederation of the Food
Industry Workers (CONTAC),
represented by
Siderlei
de Oliveiraand
from the National Confederation of Food and Related Workers (CNTA), represented
by Artur
Bueno de Carmargo, and
I want to mention our appreciation for
our Brazilian friends.