How Much Longer, Coca-Cola?
Industria de Café
INCASA,
Coca Cola’s bottling company in Guatemala,
continues to ignore the agreement signed
with SITINCA* in January 2006, thus
violating the official commitment made last
October by IUF and Coca-Cola Company
representatives in support of that agreement
The story is long and the theme is becoming
monotonous, as time goes by and no progress
is made in the negotiation of the collective
bargaining agreement between the union’s
workers and the company Industria de Café
INCASA, whose attitude in the
negotiation has been one of passiveness
aimed at drawing out the process to
exhaustion and gaining time to break the
Union, either through coercive measures or
with bribes.
Consulted by Sirel, Augusto Salazar,
secretary of Education and Training at the
Union of Workers of Industria de Café S.A.
and of Coca Cola Retalhuleu, gave his
opinion on the situation currently faced by
the workers in Guatemala.
-How is the situation now at Café INCASA?
-Our bosses are of the “heavy hand” kind,
like those of the 1980’s, whose tactics are
characterized by repression and the
violation of workers’ rights. At present,
the company’s disciplinary penalties are
focusing on the Retalhuleu plant and the
Escuintla agency, with workers receiving
reprimands by letter. These measures are
part of the strategy deployed by management
to erode the strength of the labor movement.
For example, last October 25, after
summoning the Coca Cola Retalhuleu
bottler, we entered the plant despite
resistance from the company. We were able to
overcome that resistance based on certain
articles of the collective bargaining
agreement; however, management has gone so
far as to suspend several fellow workers in
writing, merely for raising their hands to
greet us. They claim that workers can’t
greet any union leader that comes into the
plant, or anybody else for that matter, not
even the President of the Republic himself,
who is the country’s maximum authority. This
reveals the company’s arrogant repressive
stance, which tends to get worse, and which
prevents us from seeing a glimmer of change
in this situation.
-What action is the union taking against
this attitude?
-In the first place, last November 26, we
held a general meeting at Retalhuleu, with
the participation of all the workers that
represent the labor movement at INCASA. It
was a success that demonstrates the unity
we’ve been working for together with the
Union of Workers of Embotelladora Central
Sociedad Anónima (STECSA and FESTRAS**).
This was the starting point, the beginning
of a new approach in the actions that will
be carried out from now on. Workers from
Café INCASA, from both Retalhuleu and
Escuintla, participated in the meeting and
supported all the decisions taken, as did
the recently organized Huehuetenango
workers, who have been the target of the
worst persecution.
Important decisions were taken at the
meeting, such as, for example, the issuing
of a summons to the company demanding they
stop the repression. In addition, FESTRAS
and STECSA are developing a joint action
plan. A few days ago we held a series of
meetings through which we consolidated the
unity of our organizations, because while we
work for different franchises, our product
is the same: Coca-Cola.
Specifically, the action plan includes
mobilizing workers in sites near the company
and exposing this company’s practices in the
media of the Retalhuleu area, so that
everyone knows how the company exploits and
represses its employees. We will also
continue to denounce to The Coca
Cola Company the situation suffered in
these companies, and we will form a front
against the repression that we, organized
workers, are victims of, in particular at
Industrias de Café INCASA.
Along with the nonstop repression by this
bottler’s authorities in Retalhuleu and -why
not say it- with the consent of the
Guatemalan government, the “solidarista
movement,” which was created as a
counterweight strategy to diminish trade
union actions, is sponsored and promoted.
Those who join the solidaristas are granted
greater benefits than those stipulated in
the collective bargaining agreement and by
law. This “solidarismo” tactic has been used
extensively by the company, both in the past
and in the current conflict. We want to
emphasize the fact that every time a worker
joins the union or the union takes some
action or makes some progress in the
negotiations, the company goes after the
workers with repression or bribes.
-Wouldn’t it be less costly for the
company to honor the agreements, instead of
maintaining this solidarista movement?
-Of course it would be cheaper for them, but
once they eliminate the union it will be
much easier to get rid of this type of
solidarista groups, which are commanded by
some high officials from the company, even
if they are presented as labor
organizations. The only aim of investing in
solidarismo is to put an end to the labor
movement.
-Have you moved forward in the
negotiation of the collective agreement?
-No progress has been made in the
negotiations. Although the company is not
reluctant to negotiate, its attitude is very
passive. What they’re trying to do is drag
out the time it takes to reach a solution,
and that creates an agonizing situation for
the working class, because we need the wage
increase to relieve the economic situation
we’re suffering now.
-Would you like else to add anything else?
-We want to let our fellow workers know that
we continue in a state of alert and we’re
undertaking actions, although these actions
must sometimes be kept very secret, as there
are infiltrators and the company is often
ahead of us in every action we take. This is
what happened at the concentration we held
in front of the Retalhuleu plant, where
police forces, which have historically sided
with the economically powerful, showed up
immediately. This time not to repress, but
to intimidate.
Apoyo |
|
In Montevideo,
Amalia Antúnez
Rel-UITA
November 30, 2006 |
 |
|
|
* Union of Coffee Industry and Coca-Cola
Beverage Workers
** Trade Union Federation of Food,
Agroindustry and Related Industry Workers of
Guatemala
