Chile
Fonterra acquires Soprole
|
In this way it would be moving closer
to a merger with Nestlé, although reports are unclear
Fonterra
paid 202 million dollars for a 43 percent stake in Soprole, thus
obtaining a 99.44 percent controlling interest in the Chilean dairy company.
This will also give
Fonterra
an 86.19 percent interest in the
Soprole
subsidiary, Prolesur,
which owns the milk processing plants located in Temuco, Los Lagos
and Osorno.
The New
Zealand company said to the newspaper El Mercurio that “while the
parties had reached an initial understanding last October, this
understanding was subject to a number of approvals, the last of which was
only recently secured." As we informed in a previous article (The
Pope's yoghurt), one of the most important approvals was that
of the Catholic Church in Rome.
“An
alliance with Nestlé
is not in Fonterra’s
plans,”1
Eduardo Teisaire,
Fonterra’s
representative in Chile, said in reference to
Nestlé’s
alliance proposal to Soprole in May 2006. “After the stock purchase,
our goal is to device the best strategy to expand Soprole and
strengthen its exporting potential. Over the last couple years, there has
been a transformation in the market and in the company as well, and we are
now facing a very different scenario from the one in 2006,” Teisaire
explained. The senior officer ratified Soprole’s commitment to
producers, indicating that “over the last four years we have built an
excellent relationship based on mutual trust, and we will continue working
together to increase exports in Chile’s dairy industry.”
But dairy
producers, grouped under Fedeleche, are wary of the transaction, as
they believe that it will open the door for Soprole and
Nestlé
to carry out their intention of creating a new joint venture. Almost two
years ago, with that aim in mind, they filed a consultation with the
Tribunal for the Defense of Competition, which was withdrawn a few months
later. Fedeleche President Enrique Figueroa stated that “this
company’s past relationship with its suppliers, added to the risk that still
exists of a potential alliance with
Nestlé,
makes us wary of the changes that are underway and therefore alert to how
things will unfold.”
According
to the general manager of the Milk Producers Association (Aproleche),
Michel Junod, the acquisition has left them “very expectant over the
new developments.” Regarding the possibility of resuming negotiations
towards a merger with
Nestlé,
he expressed once again his categorical rejection to “any attempt [by these
companies] to even partially join their operations.”
According to figures from the Bureau of Agricultural Studies and Policies (ODEPA),
milk reception in the year 2007 totaled 1.87 billion liters, with the
leading buyers being:
Soprole |
492,38 |
Colún |
387,28 |
Nestlé |
342,35 |
Loncoleche |
210,45 |
Surlat |
121,77 |
Mulpulmo |
114,36 |
Parmalat |
73,14 |
Millions of
Liters
A merger between Soprole and
Nestlé
would
mean that a single company would be buying 834 million 730 thousand liters a
year, that is, 44.6 percent of all milk production.
This
situation is further aggravated by
Nestlé’s
decision to choose the Osorno region to install a milk-drying tower
that will enable it to increase production by 20 thousand tons. The
construction will require a 25 million dollar investment and it is expected
to begin towards the end of the year.
Meanwhile,
the workers of both companies, and the labor organizations that represent
them, must remain alert. In Colombia, in the year 2003,
CICOLAC
(a subsidiary of
Nestlé)
fired its workers, and disappeared as an industrial powdered milk processing
company, being replaced by Sociedad DPA Ltda.
With the
intent of denying that an employer substitution had taken place, DPA Ltda.
appears on paper as having acquired only the assets (machinery, goods
and properties, etc.), instead of the company as a production unit. At the
same time, it is hiring new workers through agreements with the so-called
“associated work cooperatives” (which were established by law and currently
number over 2,600 in Colombia). In this way it evaded the continuity
of the collective bargaining agreement or contract, compromising the very
existence of the union.
Curiously
enough, when Nestlé
launched DPA Ltda. it hailed it as a strategic alliance with
Fonterra,
created to ensure the continuation of the dairy production process in
Colombia, but none of the documents filed with the Colombian Chamber of
Commerce feature
Nestlé
as a partner.
With this prior record, Fedeleche’s precautions and arguments are
perfectly justified.