Simón Santana, a victim of unsafe
working conditions in Uruguay
The
transnational corporation Bimbo faces court actions
over fatal work accident
Simón was only 25. He was told to clean a machine that was
running. The company was not complying with mandatory safety
standards. He was working unsupervised. The machine had no
protective guards. His belt was caught in the moving gears.
His mother Alicia Farías denounced that his death could have
been prevented. The case has been brought before civil and
criminal courts, as well as labor courts, where a hearing
was held on Monday, December 8.
Simón Santana Farías was about to turn 26. That fatal day he
had been working for three and a half hours, cleaning a
cooling machine in the company Panificadora Bimbo del
Uruguay S.A., located in the outskirts of Montevideo, where
he had started working in early 2008.
There had been cutbacks in personnel and on that day Simón
was alone and unsupervised when his belt was caught in the
machine’s gears. A whole 15 minutes went by before anyone
came to his aid, but nothing could be done to save him.
Simón Santana’s death exposed the total disregard for safety
in the workplace exhibited by transnational corporations in
Uruguay, corporations that come to the region in search of
cheap labor and refuse to implement proper safety measures.
According to reports by the International Union of Food
Workers (IUF) and Uruguay’s trade union federation,
PIT-CNT the situation of workers in the transnational
corporations that operate in Uruguay is characterized by low
wages and a young, inexperienced workforce, with workers
that are constantly rotated or replaced if they so much as
attempt to form a trade union. Simón’s mother, 50-year-old
Alicia Farías (who named her son after Simón Riquelo, one of
the children disappeared by the Uruguayan police forces
during the dictatorship), is demanding justice. But above
all, she does not want her son’s death to have been in vain
and is calling for occupational safety to be considered a
human right. “We can’t allow multinational corporations to
have no regard for human integrity, to treat it as if it
were worthless. It’s not that we didn’t expect it, but we
can’t allow them to come here and take advantage of us,
paying meager wages and not guaranteeing even the most basic
safety conditions,” she told LA REPUBLICA. The outcome of an
investigation conducted by inspectors of the Ministry of
Labor and Social Security (MTSS) confirmed that the company
was operating in violation of several provisions of the
Occupational Accident Prevention Act (Law No. 5032), its
regulatory Decree No. 406/1988, and Decree No. 103/1996
which ratifies UNIT (the Uruguayan Technical Standards
Institute) guidelines. The company was not complying with
applicable regulations in force, and if the machine had had
protection guards, the accident would have never occurred.
The Simón Santana case is now being investigated in a civil
court proceeding (where the conciliation hearing failed), in
a criminal court proceeding (where Judge Graciela Eustachio
is conducting an inquiry), and in a labor court proceeding,
under which a hearing was held at MTSS headquarters in
Montevideo on December 8.
The importance of the name Simón
“During the last years of the dictatorship and the
democratic transition, we formed Mate Luna, a community of
puppeteers, and we used to perform with other cultural
groups like Girasol. We lived in a cooperative in the
working-class neighborhood of Peñarol. We formed the
puppeteer group and worked with the kids in Firulete, a
children’s carnival outfit. In 1982, I got pregnant and we
initially thought it was going to be a girl. That was when
we first heard Sara Méndez’ story and how her infant son,
Simón Riquelo, had been taken away from her. Then, on
November 24 of that year, my son was born, and my husband,
Ronald Santana, and I both immediately decided to name him
Simón, after the missing baby,” Alicia Farías recalls.
Alicia’s face lights up when she remembers those years, a
time when she participated in numerous mobilizations, soup
kitchens, cooperatives and social activities, taking her
puppet show and her two kids, baby Simón and his older
brother Facundo, across the country. The two boys were
present, in their parents’ arms, at significant events in
the early 1980s, like the historic May 1st march
-the first after so many years of dictatorship- and the huge
rally for democracy at the Obelisco that came to be known as
the “river of freedom,” where Mate Luna set up a giant
puppet next to the tent of the human rights organization
Serpaj. Simón
and Facundo grew up behind the puppet stage. “Simón was a
restless boy. He even got lost in the crowd at some of these
activities. We would take our eyes off him for a second and
he’d be gone, but then a little while later he’d be right
next to the stage and the sound crew would be calling for
his parents to come fetch him,” says Alicia, and laughs at
the memory of her small son, and for a moment all the pain
she’s been suffering these last three months evaporates. In
the late 1990s, Alicia’s marriage breaks up and she
emigrates to Brazil with her children. Simón was 15 when
they moved and he had already completed a computer
maintenance and assembly course. In Curitiba, Brazil, he
continued with his technical training in computers. In late
2007, they came back to Uruguay. Simón could only find work
in a cleaning company and it was that experience that helped
him secure a position in the bread manufacturer Bimbo.
“Simón was a good kid, he always followed the orders that
his superiors gave him,” Alicia says.
“It’s an opportunity to grow...”
Simón was really excited when he was hired by Bimbo. “It’s a
factory and a great opportunity to grow, you know? I won’t
be washing windows forever,” he told his mother. He began
working in January 2008 and quickly became an efficient
worker of the Mexican-based transnational corporation. He
was assigned to cleaning tasks in the Maintenance
Department. But in May he suffered his first accident when
he cut his hand on a heavy sheet of steel that slipped from
his grip. “He almost cut a tendon,” Alicia explains. He was
only given a couple of sick days covered by the State
Insurance Bank, and then he had to go back to work. “I
thought that that was the worst risk he would have to face.
I was under the impression that he worked in a very large
bakery or something, cleaning trays and that sort of thing.
One day he told me about a special task he had to do every
two weeks, which was cleaning that cooling machine. He
didn’t want to do that. I even told him to ask if he could
work in the plant and he told me that he was thinking of
applying for a transfer, but to work in another plant in
Paraguay, where he had more possibilities of being promoted.
He had discussed this with the company’s counselor. But he
wasn’t a very ambitious boy; he was different from his
brother in that sense.” Meanwhile, Simón would not give up
his passion for computers. He sold his cell phone, took out
a loan, and started buying parts to build his own computer.
He even assembled a computer for a coworker. "His brother,
Facundo, told me that he was very good at it. It was what he
really loved. He would come home from work and go straight
to his computer things. He also loved the movies and music.
He listened to bands like No Te Va Gustar, Bajofondo, Omar,
and Bersuit. He was a wholesome boy, although he wasn’t very
much into sports. He was very close to his family.” Shortly
after being hired by Bimbo, Simón told his mother that there
had been some labor problems there. The workers were not
organized in a trade union, and the workforce was made up
mostly of young people who were paid low wages and did not
last long on the job. A classic example of how a
transnational corporation operates. The cleaning crew
consisted of five people, but four months ago the company
fired two of them when it cut back on personnel. “I spoke to
some of his coworkers after what happened, and I could tell
that they were afraid,” Alicia says.
“Caught in the gears and pulled in”
On September 3, Simón went to work like on any ordinary day.
Three hours later he would suffer a serious work accident
that would cost him his life. There are contradictory
versions of how the accident happened. Simón’s mother was
told one thing by company officers, and the police reports
say another thing. The company ordered that one of the
cooling machines be cleaned while it was running, and Simón
was alone, working by himself, when his belt got caught on
the gears and he was pulled into the machine. The
investigation would reveal that he was trapped in the
machine for 15 minutes before anyone came to his aid.
According to the report of the Ministry of Labor and Social
Security’s General Inspection Office: “During the cleaning
of cooling machine #1 and as the worker came near the
equipment’s access area, where there is a gap in the
platform and the machine’s transmission system is located,
the worker’s belt was caught in the transmission system and
he was pulled into the machine.”
According to the investigation conducted by the MTSS’
General Inspection Office, Simón “was probably trying
to go from one side of the platform to the other when the
safety belt he was wearing got caught in the cooling
machine’s transmission system, snagged by the moving discs
that had no protective guards.” The MTSS report -a
copy of which LA REPUBLICA was able to obtain- also
indicates that the fatal accident occurred due to both
technical and human errors. With respect to the technical
error, there was a “mechanical hazard” because the system
had no safety shields, “thus exposing the workers to the
risk of being dragged, crushed and trapped.” The
investigation report goes on to say that the machine was
running, there was no safety procedure in place, nor were
there any safety signs. With respect to the human error, it
points out that “the company failed to identify the
mechanical hazard (posed by the transmission system and
unguarded moving parts” and states that “the task of
supervision is performed simultaneously with other tasks”
and “it is evident that the supervisor performs the same
tasks as the workers he supervises, and must do it at the
same time, so that supervision is not constant.”
Media silence
The family’s attorney, Luis Rodríguez Turrina, is confident
that the evidence gathered in the technical investigations
will be enough to prove that the company is responsible for
Simón Santana’s death, and his only concern is that the
media have practically ignored the case. “When it happened
it was featured on the news of one of the local TV networks,
but nothing more has been said about it since then,” he
points out. The silence surrounding Simón’s death also
extends to Bimbo workers, as the company adopted a
business-as-usual attitude and only closed down the plant
the night of the accident, and it only did so to the place
the guards and protective shields that the fatal machine had
been missing before the accident.
“The following day, Bimbo trucks were already out on the
street distributing the company’s bread products,” Alicia
Farías says. She wrote an open letter to the public,
denouncing her son’s death, and the letter is now being
distributed worldwide by the IUF’s Latin American
Regional Office. The case has also been taken up by
Uruguay’s trade union federation, PIT-CNT, whose leader
Walter Migliónico told LA REPUBLICA that 60 percent of all
occupational accidents in Uruguay occur among workers who
have very few months on the job.
“When tasks are organized in such a way that workers are
exposed to the hazard of coming into contact with machinery,
things usually turn out badly,” he said. “We don’t want this
to happen again. I don’t want Simón’s death to have been in
vain. I don’t know…. we just can’t allow multinational
corporations to have no regard for human integrity, as if it
were worthless. It’s not that we didn’t expect it, but we
can’t allow them to come here and take advantage of us,
paying meager wages and not guaranteeing even a minimum of
safety measures. Labor laws were violated here. These
companies don’t care about anything. If we don’t like how
things are, they close down their plants and relocate
somewhere else. That’s how many have been acting. They have
capital, and they go where labor is cheapest and where it
won’t stir up any trouble. There’s a lot of talk lately of
making the streets safe, and it is true that we’re living in
dangerous times. But my son died because of something that
could’ve been avoided; he died because the company he worked
at failed to implement proper safety measures,” Simón’s
mother told LA REPUBLICA.
The Bimbo bear in Uruguay
The Bimbo brand, identified with a cute little bear, is the
leading bread company in the world and it is owned by
independent economic conglomerates based in Mexico and
Spain.
The company was born in Mexico in 1945 and twenty years
later opened a branch in Granollers, Barcelona. In 1978, the
entire stock of the Spanish division was sold, and later, in
2001, the stock was purchased by the Sara Lee Bakery Group.
Meanwhile, the Mexican-based Grupo Bimbo expanded to 18
countries of Latin America, Europe and Asia, and now has a
total of 70 plants and 900 distribution centers, employing
over 80 thousand workers.
In 2004 its sales were worth 4.76 billion dollars. In
January 2006, Bimbo entered the Uruguayan market through the
acquisition of three companies -Walter M. Doldán, Kaiser,
and Los Sorchantes-, making a 7-million-dollar investment. A
year later it purchased Pancatalán and then El Maestro
Cubano. It presently holds 90 percent of the market of
manufactured bread products, and 25 percent of the cookies,
crackers and baked snacks market. Now it is set to take on
the chocolate market, through its latest acquisition, the
local company Plucky S.A., a family business that obtained
the Ricard chocolate brand along with the machinery of the
bankrupt Pernigotti company.
Quick fix
“In Uruguay, employers are responsible under the law for
providing a safe working environment for their workers. This
duty was established as early as 1915, with the Occupational
Accident Prevention Act. It is the counterpart to the
worker’s subordination under the work contract. When you
work for someone, you are placed in position of
subordination, because that someone is going to tell you
what you have to do. This is a fact recognized by law. But
the law also recognizes that the counterpart to the worker’s
subordination is that employers have an obligation to
provide a safe working environment for their workers. This
law is crystal clear: as of it enactment, employers are
bound by a duty to implement proper safety measures to
prevent workers from suffering accidents when using
machinery. Work accidents are not just caused by bad luck or
Divine punishment; they are the result of how work is
organized. Employers have an objective responsibility; they
have the duty to provide safe conditions. After the
accident, the company fixed the problem in only four hours.
All it had to do was put a small plate over the unprotected
area and secure it with four bolts. No large engineering
project was necessary; just a protective guard to cover the
gears that cost Simón his life,” the PIT-CNT labor leader
Walter Migliónico explained to LA REPUBLICA .
“The accident would not have occurred”
“The investigation reveals that the accident was the result
of the multiple causes identified and the company’s failure
to comply with applicable occupational safety and health
regulations. If the cooling machine’s transmission system
had been properly protected, this accident would not have
occurred.” These are the conclusions of the report from the
investigation conducted by the MTSS work inspector.
Roger
Rodríguez
Republished from
de La República, Uruguay
December 9, 2008